Comments on RFC 2100

NOTE: Any comments added here may be:

• Included in future editions, with no royalties or compensation
• Edited mercilessly
• Possibly without credit if we can't verify who you are.

Comments added by Baylink:

I'd like to note, flattered though I am to be included, that the version that made it through the RFC Editorial process was not actually the canonical version: they saw fit not to move... but to duplicate the paragraph about distribution in the lede... which I've always thought made me look a bit daft.

It would have been nice had Peter and Tom mentioned they were doing a book ... but what can you do. :-}

The canonical version, modulo centering not in the original, is at http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/97/May/hostnames.html, and thanks to Brad for posting it.